• Samosa Capital
  • Posts
  • šŸ“°The Supreme Court Just Closed Investing Tax Loopholes | Daily India Briefing

šŸ“°The Supreme Court Just Closed Investing Tax Loopholes | Daily India Briefing

Everything you need to know about Indian markets.

In partnership with

India’s Supreme Court dealt a significant tax blow to Tiger Global and strengthened domestic authorities’ power by increasing tax powers. Today, we explain more.

If you have any questions about India, fill out this form or reach out to Shreyas at [email protected]

Macro

Equities

Alts

Policy

Invest in India's Tech Wave — The India Internet ETF (INQQ)

Eternal. NYKAA. Groww. Lenskart. Swiggy. Gain exposure to the ā€œnew ageā€ technology leaders driving India's rise on the global stage -- all in a single trade. The India Internet ETF (NYSE: INQQ) allows investors to access a basket of innovative companies contributing to the future of the world’s most populous country.

From e-commerce to fintech to travel, the INQQ ETF taps into India’s rapidly expanding digital landscape and seeks to deliver a targeted way to participate in potential long-term growth. Invest with the INQQ ETF.

Reach out to [email protected] to reach our audience and see your advertisement here.

India’s Supreme Court

The Supreme Court Just Closed Investing Tax Loopholes

India’s Supreme Court dealt a significant tax blow to Tiger Global and strengthened domestic authorities’ power by increasing tax powers. It ruled that Tiger’s capital gains from the 2018 sale of Flipkart shares to Walmart are taxable under Indian law. A previous Delhi High Court ruling had allowed the hedge fund to claim protection under the India-Mauritius Treaty. Tiger first invested $9 million (₹810 million) which scaled to $1 billion (₹90 billion) for 20 percent of the firm. It sold a 15 percent stake for billions to Walmart. Not only does Tiger face a billion dollar bill, but foreign capital just got an excuse to avoid investing in India.

At the heart of the dispute is the use of Mauritius-based entities, long favored by global investors for routing investments into India due to favorable treaty provisions. Tax officials argued that Tiger Global structured its Flipkart investment through Mauritius primarily to avoid paying capital gains tax in India. The Supreme Court agreed, holding that Tiger’s attempt to seek tax exemptions in both jurisdictions ran counter to the intent of double taxation avoidance agreements, which are designed to prevent being taxed twice, not to enable being taxed nowhere.

The ruling has implications well beyond one high-profile deal. Tiger’s exit, which began with a partial sale to SoftBank in 2017 and culminated in the Walmart transaction a year later, was emblematic of the kind of offshore exits that helped fuel India’s startup boom. By bringing that transaction squarely within the domestic tax net, the court has signaled a tougher stance on treaty shopping.

Legal experts warn that the judgment could embolden tax authorities to revisit other offshore exits structured through so-called safe haven jurisdictions. While this may be welcomed by policymakers seeking to curb aggressive tax planning, it risks reviving investor concerns about retrospective scrutiny and regulatory uncertainty. For foreign funds, the decision complicates exit planning at a time when clarity and predictability are already in short supply.

See you tomorrow.

Written by Yash Tibrewal. Edited by Shreyas Sinha.

Sponsor the next newsletter to reach tens of thousands of U.S.-based business-savvy professionals. Reach out to [email protected].

Could your business use expert insights to power growth in India? Reach out to [email protected] for a free introductory call.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice or recommendation for any investment. The Content is for informational purposes only, you should not construe any such information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.