📰Deep Dive: India's Courts Slow India Down

India's tax office is singlehandedly deterring companies from entering India.

In partnership with

Good evening, 

Welcome to the best way to stay up-to-date on India’s financial markets. Today, we investigate a widespread yet little discussed crisis facing India: the country’s judicial system is criticized for its corruption, but that is not even the worst way the courts are holding the country’s economic growth back.

Then, we close with Gupshup, a round-up of the most important headlines.

Have a question you want us to answer? Fill out this form and you could be featured in our newsletter.

—Shreyas, [email protected]

Market Update.

How India’s Courts Are Slowing Down Prosperity.

India’s judiciary is now facing a severe crisis of credibility, efficiency, and independence. The discovery of burnt currency notes at the residence of Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma has only intensified growing concerns about corruption within the system. While Justice Varma has strongly denied any involvement, the problem is not just him. It is a system that falls incredibly short of a growing economy’s needs.

India’s Supreme Court building in New Delhi

Here is a frightening statistic: India has just 21 judges per million people, one of the lowest ratios in the world. Compare this to other high-flying economies like the US with 150 per million and China with 300 per million. Smaller, similar geographies like Indonesia have 50 judges per million and even Vietnan has 130 judges per million. This shortfall is exacerbated by nearly 6,000 judicial vacancies across various courts, with approximately 4,000 courtroom facilities still required to accommodate new appointments. 

Thus, India’s judicial system is overwhelmed by an enormous backlog of cases, with more than 45 million pending cases clogging the courts. In February alone, 1.77 million new cases were instituted, while only 1.18 million were disposed of, making it nearly impossible to clear the backlog at the current pace.

Another reason why: Former Bombay High Court judge Gautam Patel cites other systemic inefficiencies as a key cause. For example, serving notices to defendants, filing petitions, and even enforcing court rulings are frequently delayed due to procedural bottlenecks that vary across different courts and jurisdictions. Patel emphasizes that unless these inefficiencies are addressed, even increasing the number of judges or funding judicial infrastructure will have little impact on clearing the backlog.  

Recognizing the need for judicial efficiency, India has been working on digitizing court processes for over two decades. While some progress has been made with e-filing systems, online case tracking, and virtual hearings, implementation has been inconsistent. Many courts still operate in an analog-digital hybrid mode, leading to inefficiencies that defeat the purpose of digitalization.  A great story Patel relayed was how a judge was engaged in a month long saga of passing notes on fixing a clerk's written language rather than a concise, one-time email. 

Despite the urgent need for reform, digitalization has largely been left to individual judges and court administrators, many of whom lack the expertise or the time to drive meaningful change. Patel argues that if the judiciary were run like a corporate entity, such inefficiencies would have been outsourced to professional firms specializing in process optimization.  

Backroom dealing: Beyond inefficiency and corruption concerns, the judiciary’s independence is increasingly under scrutiny. Critics argue that the current system of judicial appointments — dominated by judges rather than an independent commission — has led to opacity and allegations of government influence over the courts.  

Several recent high-profile cases have raised alarms about judicial impartiality. The jailing of activists, journalists, and comedians has led to accusations that some judges are favoring the government rather than upholding constitutional principles. This perception, whether true or not, further erodes trust in the judiciary and raises concerns about the rule of law in India.  

A dysfunctional judicial system has far-reaching consequences beyond just the legal domain — it directly affects India’s economy and business environment. Delays in resolving commercial disputes, property claims, and contract enforcement discourage foreign and domestic investment. Businesses often wait decades for verdicts, making India one of the most challenging places in the world to settle disputes through the courts.  

Financial ramifications: Some specifics include over $60 billion (₹5.1 trillion) in investment capital locked up due to pending legal disputes. These corporate lawsuits take an average of 4 years to resolve. This past week we discussed how foreign investors balk at the high capital gains tax they face in India. There also is $15 billion (₹1.3 trillion) in unresolved tax litigation, further dissuading trading and FDI. Just look at Volkswagen's $1.4 billion (₹119.7 billion) tax settlement. While they were in the wrong and deserved that penalty, it took 12 years to actually hand out.  It's hard to estimate how much GDP shrinks due to the justice system, but 1-2 percent seems likely; investors not only are stuck in courts but they also. have to weigh potential judicial issues before beginning any projects. 

Global investors and corporations take judicial efficiency into account when deciding where to allocate capital. If businesses cannot trust that their contracts will be upheld in a timely manner, they may look elsewhere, dampening India’s long-term economic prospects. A strong and independent judiciary is a fundamental requirement for maintaining investor confidence and improving India’s ranking in global ease-of-doing-business indices. 

Message from our sponsor.

Email [email protected] to sponsor the next newsletter.

Apple just secretly added Starlink satellite support to iPhones through iOS 18.3.

One of the biggest potential winners? Mode Mobile.

Mode’s EarnPhone already reaches +45M users that have earned over $325M, and that’s before global satellite coverage. With SpaceX eliminating "dead zones" worldwide, Mode's earning technology can now reach billions more.

Mode is now gearing up for a possible Nasdaq listing (ticker: MODE) but you can still invest in their pre-IPO offering at $0.26/share.

Gupshup.

Macro

Equities

Alts

Policy

See you Monday.

Written by Yash Tibrewal. Edited by Shreyas Sinha.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice or recommendation for any investment. The Content is for informational purposes only, you should not construe any such information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.